morning,
Madame Secretary. According to the General Accountability —
the
Government Accountability Office, last fiscal year 2010 there
were
445,000 individuals detained at the Southwest border. The
Government
Accountability Office points out that of the 2,000
miles along the
southern border that 1,120 of those miles were not
yet under
operational control by the federal government.
control,”
that differentiated between “controlled,”
at 15 percent of that 873,
and 85 percent which they call
“managed,” which means that basically
they are in a
position to try to detect and detain illegal aliens
within 100
miles of the border.
I raise that issue because you made the
statement, I believe,
earlier that you think the administration’s
approach is working when
it comes to border security. And you can
correct me if I’m wrong.
I would just give you one other bit
of data, and that is from
the Border Patrol, the apprehensions
during fiscal year 2009, up to
April the 30th, 2010 — that out of
the 445,000 individuals detained
at our southwestern border, there
were 45,000 detained coming from a
total of 140 different
countries. In other words, these are not just
individuals coming
from Mexico and points south.
SEC. NAPOLITANO: These are what
are known — the category
known as “other than Mexico.”
SEN. CORNYN: That’s correct.
I noted in looking at
these statistics and these numbers, which
I will in a moment ask
to be made a part of the record, that at least
four countries are
represented on this list of 140 countries that have
been
designated by the U.S. Department of State as state sponsors
of
terrorism. How can you possibly claim that the approach of
the
administration is working when it comes to border security in
light of
these statistics?
Pressed by
John Cornyn, Napolitano says she can’t set target date to secure the
US-Mexico border
On February 21, 2011 Fox News ran a story on its website that was entitled, “Hezbollah Working With Cartels. Here is a link to the article that they posted:
In response to that article I posted a commentary where I made a number of points. At the risk of being a bit repetitious, I am furnishing you with some of what I included in my commentary below- I have placed a line of asterisks above and below that segment so that you can easily determine what was part of my previous commentary and what I have written now:
“Iran boosts Qods shock troops in Venezuela”
Iran is increasing its paramilitary Qods force operatives in Venezuela while covertly continuing supplies of weapons and explosives to Taliban and other insurgents in Afghanistan and Iraq, according to the Pentagon’s first report to Congress on Tehran’s military.
The report on Iranian military power provides new details on the group known formally as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps-Qods Force (IRGC-QF), the Islamist shock troops deployed around the world to advance Iranian interests. The unit is aligned with terrorists in Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel, North Africa and Latin America, and the report warns that U.S. forces are likely to battle the Iranian paramilitaries in the future.
The Qods force “maintains operational capabilities around the world,” the report says, adding that “it is well established in the Middle East and North Africa and recent years have witnessed an increased presence in Latin America, particularly Venezuela.”
“If U.S. involvement in conflict in these regions deepens, contact with the IRGC-QF, directly or through extremist groups it supports, will be more frequent and consequential,” the report says.
The report provides the first warning in an official U.S. government report about Iranian paramilitary activities in the Western Hemisphere. It also highlights links between Iran and the anti-U.S. government of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, who has been accused of backing Marxist terrorists in Colombia.
The report gives no details on the activities of the Iranians in Venezuela and Latin America. Iranian-backed terrorists have conducted few attacks in the region. However, U.S. intelligence officials say Qods operatives are developing networks of terrorists in the region who could be called to attack the United States in the event of a conflict over Iran’s nuclear program.
U.S. border guards got a surprise when they searched a Mexican BMW and found a hardline Muslim cleric – banned from France and Canada – curled up in the boot.
Said Jaziri, who called for the death of a Danish cartoonist that drew pictures of the prophet Mohammed, was being smuggled into California when he was arrested, along with his driver Kenneth Robert Lawler.
The 43-year-old was deported from Canada to his homeland Tunisia in 2007 after it emerged he had lied on his refugee application about having served jail time in France.
On May 26, 2010 Fox News ran a news report entitled:
Feds Issue Terror Watch for the Texas/Mexico Border
The Department of Homeland Security is alerting Texas authorities to be on the lookout for a suspected member of the Somalia-based Al Shabaab terrorist group who might be attempting to travel to the U.S. through Mexico, a security expert who has seen the memo tells FOXNews.com.
The warning follows an indictment unsealed this month in Texas federal court that accuses a Somali man in Texas of running a “large-scale smuggling enterprise” responsible for bringing hundreds of Somalis from Brazil through South America and eventually across the Mexican border. Many of the illegal immigrants, who court records say were given fake IDs, are alleged to have ties to other now-defunct Somalian terror organizations that have merged with active organizations like Al Shabaab, al-Barakat and Al-Ittihad Al-Islami.
In 2008, the U.S. government designated Al Shabaab a terrorist organization. Al Shabaab has said its priority is to impose Sharia, or Islamic law, on Somalia; the group has aligned itself with Al Qaeda and has made statements about its intent to harm the United States.
*******************************************************************************************************
The point I was attempting to make back then and the point I am once again making today is that our borders are anything but secure and our alleged “leaders” are clearly sleep-walking while criminals and terrorists are seizing every opportunity to infiltrate our nation and set up shop in hundreds of American cities in every state, from border to border and coast to coast.
It has been said, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”
The large scale apathy demonstrated by citizens of this nation has emboldened elected representatives to all but ignore the needs of the average American citizen in a quest for massive campaign funds and the promises of votes to be ostensibly delivered by special interest groups. There is much that we cannot do but there is one thing that We the People absolutely must do- we must stop sitting on the sidelines!
If this situation concerns you or especially if it angers you, I ask you to call your Senators and Congressional “Representative. This is not only your right- it is your obligation!
All I ask is that you make it clear to our politicians that we are not as dumb as they hope we are!
We live in a perilous world and in a perilous era. The survival of our nation and the lives of our citizens hang in the balance.
This is neither a Conservative issue, nor is it a Liberal issue- simply stated, this is most certainly an AMERICAN issue!
You are either part of the solution or you are a part of the problem!
Democracy is not a spectator sport!
Lead, follow or get out of the way!
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/15/border-gear-slow-to-be-deployed/
Border gear slow to be deployed
Technology to replace a now-defunct virtual-fence project at the
Mexican border likely won’t be fully in place for at least another
decade, maybe longer, according to the Government Accountability Office.
Richard
Stana, director of homeland security and justice issues at the GAO,
said Tuesday that the mix of cameras, radar and other sophisticated
technology will first be deployed to the border in Arizona over the next
two years. The technology mix is expected to be fully deployed in that
state by 2015 or 2016.
Mr. Stana, who testified Tuesday before a
House subcommittee on border and maritime security, said the security
project would next expand to California, New Mexico and Texas but isn’t
likely to be fully in place until at least 2021, and possibly not until
2026.
The new technology plan replaces a virtual-fence project
that cost nearly $1 billion before the Obama administration scrapped it
earlier this year after repeated delays and glitches. It will be added
to stationary cameras, underground sensors and other security
infrastructure already in place.
Rep. Michael T. McCaul, Texas
Republican, balked at the idea that the high-tech gear, which he said is
already available to the military, would take more than a decade to be
deployed.
“You are talking 10 to 15 years. It took us a decade to
put a man on the moon,” Mr. McCaul said. “I don’t understand why it
takes so long. You have a crisis going on down there. Everyone knows it.
We know how dangerous it is in Mexico, we know how dangerous it is on
the border. Why can’t we ramp up this process?”
Mark Borkowski,
Customs and Border Protection assistant commissioner for technology
innovation and acquisition, said the new equipment could be bought more
quickly if Congress allocated the money the Arizona project is expected
to have a price tag of about $755 million but where to put what
equipment has not been determined.
“The question is where do we put the first ones and why do we put them there,” Mr. Borkowski said.
He
said Homeland Security officials are putting the new equipment in
Arizona first because it is the busiest Border Patrol sector in the
country.
After the morning hearing, Mr. Borkowski said he had not
previously heard the GAO time line, but conceded that the technology
deployment is a multiyear plan. And future budgets will have a big
influence on how much gear is bought and when it is deployed.
The
virtual fence, which was officially abandoned in January, was initiated
in 2005 and was originally expected to be fully in place by this year.
Instead, only about 53 miles of operational “virtual fence” was put in
place in Arizona at a cost of about $15 million a mile.