Hi Gang:

Kindly forward this e-mail to as many folks as you can and then ask that those to whom you send this, to forward it along to everyone they can- I am attempting to create a “Bucket Brigade of Truth!”

I urge you to get involved and demand our elected representatives actually represent us- We the People! The information contained in my article is being provided to educate as many of our fellow Americans as possible so that they can ask the right questions and make the appropriate demands on our political leaders and representatives. The article for which I am providing the link below should motivate everyone who reads it to call his/her senators and representatives to demand answers to know what congress is going to do to protect America and Americans.

I am often asked by folks I speak with in my travels around the United States and when I am on radio programs, “What can I ask my elected representatives?” We all know that politicians are, for the most part, the most effective matadors in the world (They sure know how to throw the bull!)

So here is a fundamental question that may send these politicians running for cover- or at least cause them to twitch and shift the topic- you mission is to not let them change the topic! Keep on asking them just one fundamental question, “How do your proposals for implementing Comprehensive Immigration Reform square with the findings, recommendations and indeed, warnings of the 9/11 Commission?”

On April 6, 2015 the David Horowitz Freedom Center’s FrontPage Magazine, published my most recent article:

Connecting the Dots: Iran, Immigration & National Security »

How Obama is empowering state sponsors of terror — and weakening our first line of defense.

by Michael Cutler April 6 2015 / Read More »

John Kerry, acting on behalf of the Obama administration “negotiated” with Iran to prevent Iran from constructing nuclear weapons. It has been said that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Where nuclear weapons are concerned a gram of prevention is worth tons of cure, especially if that gram is weapons grade uranium or plutonium.

There is an anecdote about a boy who gets beaten up frequently in school. His father is upset with his son, Johnny, and tells him that he must learn to stand on his own two feet and fight back. He sends Johnny to a gym to work out and learn to defend himself. He tells his son that if he will not stand up for himself he would punish him.

A few months later, Johnny once again returns home with a black eye and torn clothing. His distraught father takes his son aside and demands to know what happened. The kid thinks for a moment and then tells his father, “Dad, you should be really proud of me!”

His father, as you might expect was incredulous and he demanded of his son, “How and why should I be proud of you?”

Johnny looked his dad in the eye and said, “One of the bullies came up to me as I was leaving school today and I hit him right on the fist with my eye!”

I suspect that Johnny’s last name was Kerry!

I will not delve into the realm of weaponry- this is outside my area of expertise- however, I cannot forget the news coverage nf then- Secretary of State Colin Powell at the United Nations, making a compelling case for military intervention in Iraq because it was believed that Iraq was working on weapons of mass destruction, especially amassing weapons-grade uranium. On February 6, 2003 CNN posted the Transcript of Powell’s U.N. presentation.

The controversy that occurred afterwards was about whether or not Iraq was actually attempting to acquire nuclear materials to create a weapon.

Iran is the world’s biggest supporter of terrorists around the world. It is an established fact that it has an ongoing nuclear program and thousands of centrifuges that could be used to amass weapons-grade fissile materials. Supposedly the point to the negotiations with Iran was to deprive it the ability to continue with its quest to acquire the ability to create atomic weapons.

It has been said that you must always bargain from a position of strength. The United States and its allies have that position of strength in the form of highly effective trade sanctions that have crippled the Iranian economy. We have them in an economic strangle hold.

Yet the administration refused to walk away from the table with Iran as did all of our allies but insisted on keeping the conversation going.

It certainly appears that the United States is willing to end the economic embargo and allow Iran to maintain all of its known nuclear facilities (only God knows what other facilities may be operating covertly). It would certainly appear that the idea of the administration is to compromise with our enemy- a country that hold massive open-air demonstrations where Iranians- especially children- chant “Death to America” and “Death to Israel.”

Iran’s generals have made it clear that they are determined to destroy Israel.

The compromise that we are now looking out would compromise national security and the security of Israel and the rest of the Middle East.

The way that Kerry has conducted “negotiations” is that Iran will do it their way and the United States will do it Iran’s way, also!

Should Iran ever possess nuclear weapons the United States would be in as much danger as Israel. The administration has done nothing to prevent Iran from operating in our hemisphere and our failures to secure our borders and effectively enforce our immigration laws from within the interior of the United States leaves us vulnerable to every terrorist organization on this planet, including those sponsored by Iran.

The administration is failing to heed the warnings, findings and recommendations of the 9/11 Commission where the failures of the immigration system are concerned. The Obama administration’s policies should earn every member of the administration involved with the DREAMERS and all of the other programs to provide aliens with immigration benefits without proper safeguards to identify, punish and thus deter fraud the “MVP Award” from ISIS, al-Qaeda and all of the other terror and criminal organizations that have targeted America and Americans.

In fact, while the 9/11 Commission warned that immigration fraud and visa fraud were essential tools used to great advantage by most of the terrorists who not only participated in the attacks of 9/11 but in other instances where terrorists attempted to carry out attacks inside the United States, nothing of consequence has been done to instill integrity into the process by which applications for immigration benefits are adjudicated.

Indeed, as you will see in my article- quite the opposite is happening especially as the administration processes applications for millions of aliens each and every year- many of whom not being required to show up for a face to face interview.

The 9/11 Commission Staff Report on Terrorist Travel detailed numerous examples of instances where terrorists not only made use of visa and immigration benefit fraud to enter the United States but to also embed themselves in the United States. Page 47 of this report noted:

“Once terrorists had entered the United States, their next challenge was to find a way to remain here. Their primary method was immigration fraud. For example, Yousef and Ajaj concocted bogus political asylum stories when they arrived in the United States. Mahmoud Abouhalima, involved in both the World Trade Center and landmarks plots, received temporary residence under the Seasonal Agricultural Workers (SAW) program, after falsely claiming that he picked beans in Florida.”

It is significant to note that the Seasonal Agricultural Program, also known as the Special Agricultural Program (SAW) were major components of the 1986 Amnesty at that New York’s then Congressman Chuck Schumer was one of that program’s major architects even though there were absolutely no farms in his congressional district when he concocted it.

This paragraph is found on page 98 of the report, under the title “Immigration Benefits:”

“Terrorists in the 1990s, as well as the September 11 hijackers, needed to find a way to stay in or embed themselves in the United States if their operational plans were to come to fruition. As already discussed, this could be accomplished legally by marrying an American citizen, achieving temporary worker status, or applying for asylum after entering. In many cases, the act of filing for an immigration benefit sufficed to permit the alien to remain in the country until the petition was adjudicated. Terrorists were free to conduct surveillance, coordinate operations, obtain and receive funding, go to school and learn English, make contacts in the United States, acquire necessary materials, and execute an attack.”

In the days, weeks and months after the terror attacks of September 11, 2001 a veritable parade of politicians- especially members of both the House of Representatives and the United States Senate solemnly filed up to stand before the television cameras and the forest of microphones attached to the podium and thumped that podium or, perhaps, thumped their chests demanding to know, “Why no one had connected the dots!”

I have testified before well over a dozen Congressional hearings in both the House of Representatives and the Senate and provided testimony to the 9/11 Commission. Perhaps the highest profile hearing I for which I have been called to testify was conducted on March 19, 2002 by the House Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims, on the topic:

“INS’S MARCH 2002 NOTIFICATION OF APPROVAL OF CHANGE OF STATUS FOR PILOT TRAINING FOR TERRORIST HIJACKERS MOHAMMED ATTA AND MARWAN AL-SHEHHI”

This hearing was covered by C-SPAN and the C-SPAN video every member of Congress should be required to watch it. It is unfathomable how thirteen years after that hearing was conducted into one of the most outrageous screw-ups that all of the promises to address the failures of the system continue to plaque the very same system that would be required to adjudicate the applications filed by unknown millions of illegal illegal aliens in the United States under “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” and the administration continues to prepare to process millions of illegal aliens to provide them with official identity documents to provide proof that they have been granted temporary lawful status without legal justification and without being interviewed in person!

The dots have been well connected- repeatedly by a parade of experts who provided testimony to the 9/11 Commission and before a long list of Congressional hearings conducted before numerous committees and subcommittees in both the House and Senate, yet many of these same “leaders” cringe at the mere mention of the 9/11 Commission Report or its findings- especially when the issue of Comprehensive Immigration Reform is concerned.

On July 27, 2006 I testified before the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Claims on the topic:

WHETHER THE ATTEMPTED IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REID-KENNEDY IMMIGRATION BILL WILL RESULT IN AN ADMINISTRATIVE AND NATIONAL SECURITY NIGHTMARE

In my testimony back then, I made my opposition to the Senate immigration bill, S.2611 abundantly clear. I noted that any member of Congress who would vote to provide lawful status and identity documents for millions of illegal aliens should be given “The MVP Award by al-Qaeda!” You can see a segment of my testimony at that hearing in a video that has been posted on You Tube.

There are other politicians who want to sound “tough” and say that “First we must secure the border.” Of course they are referencing the US/Mexican border that is as porous as a sieve. Make no mistake- that border must be made secure- but it is hardly the only component of the dysfunctional system- yet for these BS artists- and that is exactly what they are- the Mexican border had nothing to do with the terror attacks of September 11, 2001!

The first step in problem solving is to identify the components of the problem and then devising the best strategies to most effectively deal with the problem. However, sometimes solutions run contrary to competing interests. Immigration is an issue that has proven to be problematic for many politicians who seek to garner campaign contributions from those individuals and special interest groups that have found huge profits to be had in the massive influx of aliens.

The need candidates have for ever-increasing amounts of money to mount successful political campaigns. Perhaps the time has come for our politicians to add a new position to their staffs, that of “Official Auctioneer!” Those making the huge campaign contributions do so because they seek to buy influence among our political leaders and they are succeeding. Increasingly we are, indeed, getting the “Best Government Money Can Buy!”

The politicians understand that they must “deliver” when they accept those huge campaign contributions. They understand that if they do what their major contributors want that they will face hostile voters at the next election. Their “solution” is to offer legislation and programs that create the illusions of meeting the needs and expectations of their constituents while nothing could be further from the truth.

On February 5, 2015 FrontPage Magazine posted my article:

The ‘Secure Our Border First Act’ Deception »

Why it’s no solution to the immigration crisis.

As the saying goes, you have to read between the lines to understand how this “game” is being played. Of course, this is hardly a game- America’s national security and the lives of Americans hang in the balance.

The motivation for importing huge numbers of foreign workers is to drive down wages and working conditions to maximize profit- at the expense of hard working Americans. This is not only the case where the physically demanding low skilled jobs are concerned but even where high tech jobs are concerned where the employees are highly educated and have post-graduate degrees.

On July 22, 2014 FrontPage Magazine posted my article:

“Immigration ‘Reform’: Engineered Destruction of the Middle Class”

The real reason high-tech titans are lining up behind the amnesty effort.

On November 15th I was honored to join three true leaders in the United States Congress in a panel discussion on immigration- Senator Jeff Sessions and Congressmen Louis Gohmert and John Fleming. A video of this panel discussion has been posted on the David Horowitz Freedom Center’s website under the title,

“Immigration Wars”

The perspectives of these true leaders are well worth listening to.

This is the link to that video:

[vimeo 113190066]

FrontPage Magazine posted the video and a transcript of this panel discussion.

To provide you with a bit of additional material, during my remarks at the panel discussion, I referenced an Op-Ed I had written for the Washington Times in which I articulated my concerns about the previous attempt to enact Comprehensive Immigration Reform that the Washington Times published on June 22, 2007. Senator Jeff Sessions quoted from my commentary, on three separate dates, from the floor of the U.S. during the contentious floor debates. In my piece I recommended that Comprehensive Immigration Reform be given a more honest and descriptive title, I suggested that it be renamed the “Terrorist Assistance and Facilitation Act!”

I recommend you review Senator Session’s statement on June 27, 2007 from the floor of the U.S. Senate on the Immigration Bill in which the Senator made reference to my suggested new name to that disastrous legislation in my Washington Times Op-Ed. His impassioned pleas to his colleagues averted a catastrophe and that legislation was defeated. However, not unlike Freddy Krueger, Comprehensive Immigration Reform has been brought back to life through the unilateral actions of President Obama and his proposed executive actions. Furthermore, there are politicians from both parties willing to give this legislative betrayal of America and Americans CPR!

My Op-Ed was entitled:

Immigration bill a ‘No Go’

On December 19, 2014 Californians for Population Stabilization (CAPS) posted my commentary:

Obama’s ‘Gift’ to International Terrorists: Immigration Executive Action

Today our nation and our citizens face a list of challenges and threats- nearly every one of which is being exacerbated by long-standing failures of our nation to secure our borders and enforce our immigration laws. To be clear, it is not “Anti-Immigrant” to want these two issues to be dealt with effectively. In point of fact, the same immigration laws that mandate the categories of aliens to be kept our of our country and the terms under which aliens should be removed from our country have absolutely nothing to do with race, religion or ethnicity, also provide for the lawful admission of roughly one million lawful immigrants and the naturalization of hundreds of thousands of new citizens each year.

It is therefore a contradiction in terms and thinking to claim that it is “Anti-Immigrant” to support the effective enforcement and administration of our immigration laws

Let us be clear in our thinking- it is “Pro-Immigrant” to be “Pro-Enforcement!”

When the issue of immigration comes up most people purely focus on the lack of integrity to the border that is supposed to separate the United States from America. Clearly that border lacks integrity and represents little more than a speed bump to smugglers who transport illegal aliens and contraband including record quantities of dangerous drugs such as heroin and cocaine into the United States.

However, there are many more components to the immigration system including systems by which aliens are granted visas to enter the United States and various immigration benefits such as conferring employment authorization to aliens in the United States and also include the adjudications process by which aliens are granted lawful immigrant status and even United States citizenship.

All of these systems of the immigration system lack integrity. Aliens who have gone on to commit crimes and even participate in terrorist attacks have often been dissevered to have successfully gamed the immigration benefits program in order to embed themselves in communities around the United States as they went about their deadly preparations.